Q. "Human wildlife conflict has emerged as a major challenge to both biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods in India". Discuss the...

Name: Sarat Chandra Academy
Price range: ₹₹
Rating: 4.8

2026-07-18

Question

Q. "Human wildlife conflict has emerged as a major challenge to both biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods in India". Discuss the ecological and socio-economic impacts of human wildlife conflict in India (15 marks 250 Words)

Model Answer

Paper

GS III

Subject

Environment and Biodiversity

Syllabus as Per Notification

Conservation, Environment Pollution and Degradation, Environmental Impact Assessment.

Topic

Human-Wildlife Conflict

Approach:

Introduction

Introduce by briefly defining Human-Wildlife conflict and mention related data on Human and Wildlife deaths in India.

Body

Discuss the ecological and socio-economic impacts of human wildlife with relevant examples

Ecological Impacts of Human–Wildlife Conflict

Decline in Wildlife Populations due to Retaliatory Killings, Disruption of Ecological Balance and Food Chains, Habitat Fragmentation and Loss of Ecological Connectivity and Genetic Isolation of Wildlife Populations

Socio-Economic Impacts on Rural Livelihoods

Crop Damage and Loss of Agricultural Income, Loss of Human Life and Livestock, Livelihood Distress and Migration and Worsening Social Inequities

Way forward

Establishing Biological Corridors, Promoting Coexistence-Based Conservation and Scaling up Table-Top Red Markings on Highways

Conclusion

Conclude by emphasising the need for balancing ecological security with livelihood security there by fulfilling principles under Article 48A

Context

Union Environment Minister inaugurates Centre of Excellence on Human-Wildlife Conflict at WII-SACON, Coimbatore and launches National Human-Wildlife Conflict Portal.

Introduction

Human–Wildlife Conflict (HWC) refers to situations where interactions between humans and wildlife result in negative consequences for either or both. IUCN defines it as conflicts arising when wildlife requirements overlap with those of human populations, causing costs to people and retaliatory actions against wildlife.

Between 2019–20 and 2023–24, India recorded 2,853 human deaths and 528 elephant deaths due to human–elephant conflict, highlighting the growing ecological and socio-economic challenge posed by increasing human–wildlife interactions.

Body

Ecological Impacts of Human–Wildlife Conflict

Decline in Wildlife Populations due to Retaliatory Killings

Repeated attacks on humans or crop damage trigger retaliatory actions such as poisoning, electrocution and shooting, which reduces already vulnerable populations of endangered species.

Example: In Assam, 626 elephant deaths were recorded over the past 23 years, with electrocution being the leading cause of mortality,

Disruption of Ecological Balance and Food Chains

Large mammals such as tigers, leopards and elephants are keystone species, with elephants serving as Ecosystem engineers that promote seed dispersal and habitat regeneration.

Frequent elimination of predators leads to Increase in herbivore populations and Overgrazing and forest degradation.

Habitat Fragmentation and Loss of Ecological Connectivity

Linear infrastructure like roads and railways fragments wildlife habitats, obstructing animal movement and increasing conflict.

Example: Highway expansion across the Bandipur–Nagarhole landscape interrupts elephant movement.

Genetic Isolation of Wildlife Populations

Fragmented habitats restrict breeding between populations, leading to reduced genetic diversity and increased extinction risk for wide-ranging species like tigers and elephants.

Example: WII identifies fragmented tiger corridors in Central India and elephant corridors in the Nilgirisas critical areas where restoring connectivity is essential to maintain genetic diversity.

Socio-Economic Impacts of Human –Wildlife Conflict

Crop Damage and Loss of Agricultural Income

Crop raiding by elephants, wild boar, and nilgai is the most widespread form of HWC.

Example: A study by the Gokhale Institute estimated the net annual agricultural loss in Maharashtra due to wildlife to be between Rs 10,000 and Rs 40,000 crore.

Loss of Human Life and Livestock

Human–wildlife conflict causes fatalities, injuries and livestock depredation, resulting in psychological trauma and significant livelihood losses for forest-fringe communities.

Example: In Uttarakhand, between 2014–2024, leopards caused over 200 human deaths and 1,000+ injuries, while a study in the Rajaji–Corbett corridor found that 19% of households reported livestock losses.

Livelihood Distress and Migration

Constant threat of attacks and financial losses makes agriculture unviable, forcing families to abandon their lands.

Farmers in Bundelkhand (Chhatarpur district) openly declared plans to migrate to Delhi and other cities for wage labour if crop losses persist.

Worsening Social Inequities:

Burden of HWC falls disproportionately on already vulnerable communities, particularly tribal populations and small-scale farmers living on forest fringes.

Example: Recurring wildlife attacks in Wayanad (Kerala) led to protests over delays in compensation and conflict mitigation, highlighting the burden on forest-dependent communities.

Way Forward

Establishing Biological Corridors:

Strengthening ecological connectivity on the lines of Bhutan's Biological Corridor Network by linking protected areas and buffer zones to facilitate safe wildlife movement and reduce human–wildlife conflict.

Promoting Coexistence-Based Conservation

Adopting IUCN SSC Human–Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence Specialist Group (HWCCSG) approach of coexistence-based, community-led and science-driven conflict management.

Scaling up Table-Top Red Markings on Highways

Replicating table-top red markings on National Highways adjoining protected areas, on the lines of Bhopal–Jabalpur National Highway near Veerangana Durgavati Tiger Reserve (Madhya Pradesh) to regulate vehicle speed and facilitate safe wildlife crossings.

Conclusion

Human–wildlife conflict is not merely a conservation issue but a governance and sustainable development challenge. As envisaged in the National Wildlife Action Plan (2017–31), achieving coexistence requires protected wildlife corridors and community-based conservation. As Justice B.V. Nagarathna aptly observed, “Our focus should be on understanding why wildlife is entering human spaces rather than viewing the issue solely as wildlife encroachment”. Balancing ecological security with livelihood security is essential to fulfil Article 48A and India's commitments under the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

Value Addition

Some of the Government Measures to reduce to ecological and socio-economic impacts of human wildlife conflict in India:

National Wildlife Action Plan (2017–31): Promotes landscape-based conflict mitigation by securing wildlife corridors and integrating HWC management into conservation planning.

Centre of Excellence on Human–Wildlife Conflict (WII–SACON): To undertake research, develop scientific mitigation strategies and provide policy support to States.

National Human–Wildlife Conflict Portal: A centralised digital platform for reporting conflict incidents, facilitating evidence-based planning and improving inter-state coordination.

Project Elephantand Project Tiger: Focus on protecting critical habitats and wildlife corridors, strengthening conservation of elephants and tigers, and reducing human–wildlife conflict through habitat restoration and financial assistance to States.

National Hackathon on Human-Wildlife Conflict (HWC): To encourage creative solutions to mitigate conflicts, enhance real-time decision-making using advanced tools such as AI, spatial analytics and community engagement models.

Kerala’s three-tier strategy of containment, mitigation and compensation to address the growing challenge of human-wildlife conflict.