Q. "The law must balance the sanctity of marriage with the realities of marital breakdown." Discuss. (10 marks 150 Words)
Model Answer
Q."The law must balance the sanctity of marriage with the realities of marital breakdown." Discuss. (10 marks 150 Words)
Paper
GS I
Subject
Indian Society
Syllabus as Per Notification
Salient features of Indian Society, Diversity of India; Role of women and women's organization; Population and associated issues; Urbanization, their problems and remedies.
Topic
Marriage, Family and Changing Social Institutions; Marital Breakdown, Divorce Laws, Gender Justice and Social Change
Approach:
Introduction
Define marriage as an important social institution that promotes family stability, social cohesion, and emotional security.
Briefly highlight changing social realities, rising individual autonomy, and increasing instances of marital breakdown.
Body
Explain why the law seeks to preserve marriage by discussing its social, cultural, and familial significance.
Examine why the law must also recognize marital breakdown in cases of cruelty, incompatibility, prolonged separation, and irretrievable collapse of relationships.
Discuss judicial interventions, the concept of Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage (IBM), existing legal limitations, and challenges relating to gender justice, maintenance, and child welfare.
Suggest reforms that balance family stability with constitutional values of dignity, equality, and personal liberty.
Conclusion
Emphasize that preserving marriage and recognizing marital breakdown are complementary rather than contradictory objectives.
Highlight that the law should promote reconciliation where possible but provide a dignified exit where the relationship has irretrievably failed.
Introduction
Marriage has traditionally been viewed as a sacred social institution that provides stability, companionship, and continuity to family life. However, social transformation, changing gender relations, and increasing assertion of individual rights have led to situations where marital relationships become irretrievably dysfunctional. In such circumstances, the law faces the challenge of balancing the preservation of marriage as a social institution with the need to protect individual dignity and provide relief from failed relationships.
Body
Need to Preserve the Sanctity of Marriage
· Marriage as a Foundation of Society
Marriage serves as the foundation of the family, which is considered the basic unit of society.
Stable marital relationships contribute to social order, emotional well-being, and community harmony.
· Protection of Children and Dependents
A stable marital environment promotes the healthy upbringing and development of children.
It also provides emotional and economic support to dependent family members.
· Social and Cultural Significance
Marriage occupies a central place in India's social, cultural, and religious traditions.
Therefore, the law seeks to preserve marital relationships through various legal safeguards.
· Importance of Reconciliation
Many marital disputes arise from temporary conflicts and misunderstandings that can be resolved through dialogue.
Consequently, family courts encourage mediation and counselling before granting divorce.
Need to Recognize the Realities of Marital Breakdown
· Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage
Some marriages reach a stage where mutual trust, affection, and companionship cease to exist.
In such circumstances, continuation of the legal relationship serves little practical purpose.
· Protection of Individual Dignity
Article 21 guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which includes the right to live with dignity.
Forcing individuals to remain in a dead marriage may undermine their autonomy and well-being.
· Prevention of Mental Cruelty
Prolonged matrimonial disputes often result in severe emotional, psychological, and financial hardship.
The Supreme Court has observed that compelling estranged spouses to continue such relationships may amount to cruelty.
· Avoiding “Perpetuity of Marriage on Paper”
The Supreme Court recently noted that preserving a marriage that is “already decayed and decomposing day by day” benefits neither the parties nor society.
The Court further observed that keeping such marriages alive merely creates a “perpetuity of marriage on paper”.
· Adapting to Changing Social Realities
Urbanization, education, and greater economic independence have transformed societal expectations from marriage.
The legal framework must evolve to accommodate these changing realities.
Judicial Efforts to Balance Both Concerns
· Use of Article 142
The Supreme Court has exercised its powers under Article 142 to dissolve marriages that are beyond repair.
This power has been used to ensure complete justice in exceptional cases.
· Recognition of Irretrievable Breakdown
The judiciary has repeatedly acknowledged that some marriages become incapable of restoration despite legal continuance.
Courts have emphasized that legal formalities should not prolong human suffering.
· Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli (2006)
The Supreme Court recommended that Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage (IBM) be incorporated as a statutory ground for divorce.
The Court highlighted the need to align matrimonial laws with social realities.
· Mutual Consent Divorce
Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act allows couples to dissolve a marriage through mutual consent.
This provision recognizes that some marriages may fail despite the absence of fault on either side.
Challenges in Balancing Both Objectives
· Absence of Statutory Recognition of IBM
Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage is still not a separate statutory ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Consequently, relief often depends upon judicial intervention rather than legislative clarity.
· Gender Justice Concerns
Women frequently enter divorce proceedings from a position of social and economic disadvantage.
Therefore, reforms must ensure that divorce laws do not become instruments of exploitation or abandonment.
· Issues of Maintenance and Custody
Questions relating to maintenance, child custody, residential rights, and matrimonial property often complicate divorce proceedings.
Adequate legal safeguards are necessary to protect vulnerable spouses and children.
· Delays in Matrimonial Litigation
Matrimonial disputes often remain pending for several years, causing emotional distress and financial hardship.
Delayed resolution frequently aggravates conflicts instead of resolving them.
Conclusion
The sanctity of marriage remains an important societal value that deserves legal protection. At the same time, the law cannot ignore situations where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and exists only in legal form. Therefore, a balanced legal framework must preserve marriages capable of reconciliation while allowing a dignified and just exit from relationships that have ceased to exist in substance.