Constitution (131st) Amendment Bill and the Delimitation Bill

Constitution (131st) Amendment Bill and the Delimitation Bill
  • Context:

  • The Centre introduced the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026, and the companion Delimitation Bill, 2026, in a Special Session of Parliament.

  • These Bills propose monumental changes to India's representative map by restarting the delimitation process and removing the long-standing constitutional freeze on the readjustment of legislative seats.

  • Constitutional Amendments:

  • The Bill amends Articles 81, 82, and 170, deleting provisions that postponed seat readjustments.

  • The current freeze, enacted through a 2001 consensus froze inter-state Lok Sabha seat distribution based on the 1971 Census and intra-state boundaries on the 2001 Census until the first census after 2026.

  • The amendment increases the maximum size of the Lok Sabha from the current ceiling of 550 to 850 seats (815 allocated for States and 35 for Union Territories).

  • It substitutes Article 334A to operationalise a 33% reservation for women in Parliament and State Assemblies.

  • Crucially, this quota will only come into effect after the fresh delimitation exercise is completed based on the latest published Census (which is currently the 2011 Census).

  • The Delimitation Commission:

  • The Delimitation Bill, 2026, explicitly assigns the redrawing task to a statutory Delimitation Commission.

  • Composition:

  • It will be chaired by a former or sitting Supreme Court judge and will include the Chief Election Commissioner (or an Election Commissioner nominated by them) and the respective State Election Commissioner.

  • Impact and Concerns:

  • By basing the new seat allocation on the 2011 Census, the Bills propose a massive inter-state redistribution.

  • The Hindi heartland's share of Lok Sabha seats will jump from 38.1% to 43.1%, while the Southern States' share will shrink from 24.3% to 20.7%.

  • For instance, Uttar Pradesh stands to gain 58 seats, while Kerala will gain only three.

  • Consequently, several Southern States (like Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Telangana) and Punjab had strongly demanded extending the existing freeze for another 25 years, a demand that was overlooked.