Centre Can’t Treat States as ‘Subordinates’

Centre Can’t Treat States as ‘Subordinates’
  • Context:

  • In a recent lecture titled ‘Constitutionalism beyond Rights: Why Structure Matters at the Chanakya National Law University, Supreme Court judge Justice B.V. Nagarathna made significant observations regarding the nature of Centre-State relations in India, asserting that the Centre cannot treat States as "subordinates".

  • Key Observations on Federalism:

  • Justice Nagarathna emphasised that Indian federalism is fundamentally a "constitutional arrangement of co-equals."

  • The Centre must view the States as coordinates rather than subordinates in the national governance structure.

  • Citizens are entitled to the benefits and welfare schemes of both the Central and State governments.

  • The Centre cannot adopt a "pick and choose approach" when implementing development programmes across different regions

  • Equity and a fair approach must remain the guiding principles.

  • S.R. Bommai v Union of India (1994):

  • Supreme Court laid great emphasis on preserving the powers of the states.

  • The SC held that States were not mere appendages of the Centre, but autonomous entities with constitutionally guaranteed powers.